|
PIP No:
255
|
|
1. PROJECT NAME:
Mine/ERW Clearance
|
|
ឈ្មោះគម្រោងៈ
ការបោសសម្អាតមីននិងសំណល់ជាតិផ្ទុះពីសង្រ្គាម
|
| 2. PROJECT DATES: |
|
PROJECT START :
|
|
ESTIMATED COMPLETION :
|
|
|
|
4. RESPONSIBLE MINISTRY:
Cambodian Mine Action and Victim Assistance Authority
|
|
RESPONSIBLE UNIT:
Regulation and Monitoring Department
|
|
អង្គភាពទទួលខុសត្រូវ:
នាយកដ្ឋានបទបញ្ញត្តិ និងត្រួតពិនិត្យ
|
|
5. PROJECT STATUS
|
|
DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION
|
|
|
6. TYPE OF PROJECT:
|
|
7. SOURCE OF PROJECT FUNDING:
|
| 8. THE POLICY AREA OF THE PENTAGON STRATEGY PHASE I THAT THIS PROJECT FALLS UNDER: |
|
|
| 9. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE POLICY: |
|
To clear landmine/Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) areas for agriculture, settlement and infrastructure development in order to reduce people poverty. |
| 10. Support to Cambodia Industrial Development Policy |
|
Does this Project support to the implementation of the Cambodia Industrial Development Policy?
|
|
11. SECTOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. PROJECT LOCATION: (Describe the location of the project and its components.) |
|
|
| 13. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: (Describe the major purpose of the project.) |
|
- Mine/ERW Clearance
- Estimate the need of mine/EWR clearance |
| 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Provide a description of the project and all its components.) |
|
An extrapolation of available survey and clearance data done for the purpose of developing the APMBC article 5 Extension Request focused on mine include the estimation clearance on Mine and ERW. A new comprehensive baseline survey (BLS) is now underway that will generate a much firmer estimate of contamination which, undoubtedly, will remain substantial. In 2023, the remaining of landmine and ERW contamination is over 1,817 km2 of land. |
| 15. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: (Give reasons why this particular project is considered worthwhile.) |
|
- Policy and strategy on mine action is linked to national and sub-national policy
- CMAA can create existing monitoring system to deliver real quality for sustainable of development result and impact
- Minimize contaminated areas of mine/ERW which located in poorest provinces and most effected to be free impact |
| 16. BENEFITS (Who will benefit, directly and indirectly, from the project?) |
|
People who living in community effected by landmine/ERW especially the particularly areas |
| 17. FEASIBILITY STUDY |
|
Is a "Feasibility Study " for the Project requied?
|
| 18. SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: (Briefly describe the effects of the project, if any, on the people and the surrounding environment. Will the project assist in alleviating poverty?) |
|
Generally, mine clearance is effected the environment such bush and small tree cutting because it is easy for using detector or detection dog. But, mine clearance is an assistance to reduce poverty because it converts landmine/ERW contaminated areas to safe land for agriculture and other settlements. |
| 19. CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
a. Is any activity or output of the project related to Climate Change?
|
|
b. How is the project relevant to Climate Change?
|
|
Please select a Climate Change related sector of the project and fill up the contribution of the climate change related expenditure compared to the total project cost.
|
|
Climate Change-Related Sector
|
Percentage
|
Climate Change Relevance
|
|
4. Climate change proofing of Infrastructure | ៤. ការសាងសង់ហេដ្ឋារចនាសម្ព័ន្ធដោយបានដាក់បញ្ចូលការប្រែប្រួលអាកាសធាតុ
|
0
|
No Relevance
|
| 20. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION |
|
Is any activity or output of the project related to Disaster Risk Reduction?
|
| 21. GENDER ANALYSIS: (How does the project affect the roles of the men and women in the project area? Will women be actively involved in the implementation of the project?) |
|
Currently, most de-mining organizations are trying to be transparent on gender issues in mine action. Recently, many de-mining organizations have recruited women to work as de-miners, EOD and dog handlers and women are promoted to decision-making positions. |
| 22. CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT: (Does the Ministry have the skills and experience required to implement the project?) |
|
CMAA has enough capacity and experience in implementing mine/ERW clearance project
|
| 23. STATUS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: (Provide a brief update on the progress of the project to date. Discuss any major problems causing delays in project implementation.) |
|
Project progress:
- bidding mine clearance
- Clearing in provinces effected by the most impact of mine
Challenges:
- Lack of funding for dissemination of national guidelines and standards, capacity building and quality monitoring management
|
|
24. PROJECT PRIORITY
:
(Please indicates the priority ranking of the project decided by the ministry/agency.)
|
|
1
|
| 25. DONOR INVOLVEMENT: (Provide any information on current or potential donor involvement in the project.) |
|
Clearing For Results-IV project, UNDP |
| 26. REFERENCE: (Please upload the project documents, MOU, or agreements with funding agencies including MEF.) |
|
Part B: Project Costs and Funding Sources
( In US$’000 )
|
|
|