|
PIP No:
1188
|
|
1. PROJECT NAME:
Construction of the International Border Checkpoint
|
|
ឈ្មោះគម្រោងៈ
សាងសង់ទីស្នាក់ការត្រួតពិនិត្យច្រកទ្វារអន្តរជាតិ
|
| 2. PROJECT DATES: |
|
PROJECT START :
|
|
ESTIMATED COMPLETION :
|
|
|
|
4. RESPONSIBLE MINISTRY:
|
|
RESPONSIBLE UNIT:
General Department of Administration
|
|
អង្គភាពទទួលខុសត្រូវ:
|
|
5. PROJECT STATUS
|
|
DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION
|
|
|
6. TYPE OF PROJECT:
|
|
7. SOURCE OF PROJECT FUNDING:
|
| 8. THE POLICY AREA OF THE PENTAGON STRATEGY PHASE I THAT THIS PROJECT FALLS UNDER: |
|
|
| 9. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE POLICY: |
|
Developing the border area provides an easy way to change the goods, people's journeys and travelers, contributing to the development of the economy and facilitating the cross-border transportation. |
| 10. Support to Cambodia Industrial Development Policy |
|
Does this Project support to the implementation of the Cambodia Industrial Development Policy?
|
|
11. SECTOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. PROJECT LOCATION: (Describe the location of the project and its components.) |
|
|
| 13. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: (Describe the major purpose of the project.) |
|
The construction of the building, the international border gate and other infrastructure contributes to the development of the border area, making it easy to change the goods, the travel of people and tourists, contributing to the development of the economy and facilitating cross-border and highway transport. |
| 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Provide a description of the project and all its components.) |
|
The construction of the International Border Gate consists of construction, roads, water systems, systems, lighting and equipment for working at the International Checkpoint Such as :
1. Doung international Border Checkpoint Battambang Province (3.900.000$)
2. Prum international Border Checkpoint Pailin Province (3.900.000$)
3. Cham Yeam international Border Checkpoint Koh Kong Province (3.900.000$)
4. Osmach international Border Checkpoint Odor Meanchey Province (3.900.000$)
5. Tropeang Sre international Border Checkpoint Kratie Province (3.900.000$)
6. Phnom Den international Border Checkpoint Takeo Province (3.900.000$)
7. Tropieng Phlong international Border Checkpoint Tboung Khmum Province (3.900.000$)
8. Oyadav international Border Checkpoint Ratanakiri Province (3.900.000$) |
| 15. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: (Give reasons why this particular project is considered worthwhile.) |
|
This project helps to provide a diversified tourism commodity that can help boost national economy and reduce poverty. |
| 16. BENEFITS (Who will benefit, directly and indirectly, from the project?) |
|
Those who benefit from the project are the people in this area and the local authority, commune and district. |
| 17. FEASIBILITY STUDY |
|
Is a "Feasibility Study " for the Project requied?
|
|
If YES, has it been carried out?
|
| 18. SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: (Briefly describe the effects of the project, if any, on the people and the surrounding environment. Will the project assist in alleviating poverty?) |
|
None |
| 19. CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
a. Is any activity or output of the project related to Climate Change?
|
|
b. How is the project relevant to Climate Change?
|
|
Please select a Climate Change related sector of the project and fill up the contribution of the climate change related expenditure compared to the total project cost.
|
|
Climate Change-Related Sector
|
Percentage
|
Climate Change Relevance
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION |
|
Is any activity or output of the project related to Disaster Risk Reduction?
|
| 21. GENDER ANALYSIS: (How does the project affect the roles of the men and women in the project area? Will women be actively involved in the implementation of the project?) |
|
Women can become livelihoods by purchasing goods and services |
| 22. CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT: (Does the Ministry have the skills and experience required to implement the project?) |
|
The Ministry of Interior has specialized units (General Department of Administration), with specialists who have experience in capacity for project implementation
|
| 23. STATUS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: (Provide a brief update on the progress of the project to date. Discuss any major problems causing delays in project implementation.) |
|
None |
|
24. PROJECT PRIORITY
:
(Please indicates the priority ranking of the project decided by the ministry/agency.)
|
|
7
|
| 25. DONOR INVOLVEMENT: (Provide any information on current or potential donor involvement in the project.) |
|
None |
| 26. REFERENCE: (Please upload the project documents, MOU, or agreements with funding agencies including MEF.) |
|
Part B: Project Costs and Funding Sources
( In US$’000 )
|
|
|