|
PIP No:
1234
|
|
1. PROJECT NAME:
Diversity and quantity of fish larvae assessment in Tonle Sap Lake tributaries.
|
|
ឈ្មោះគម្រោងៈ
វាយតម្លៃភាពសំបូរបែប និងបរិមាណកូនត្រីនៅតាមដៃនៃបឹងទន្លេសាប
|
| 2. PROJECT DATES: |
|
PROJECT START :
|
|
ESTIMATED COMPLETION :
|
|
|
|
4. RESPONSIBLE MINISTRY:
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
|
|
RESPONSIBLE UNIT:
|
|
អង្គភាពទទួលខុសត្រូវ:
|
|
5. PROJECT STATUS
|
|
DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION
|
|
|
6. TYPE OF PROJECT:
|
|
7. SOURCE OF PROJECT FUNDING:
|
| 8. THE POLICY AREA OF THE PENTAGON STRATEGY PHASE I THAT THIS PROJECT FALLS UNDER: |
|
|
| 9. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE POLICY: |
|
The project will contribute to fisheries management and planning in Tonle Sap Lake and its tributaries and to inform the impacts of development on the Lake's tributaries. |
| 10. Support to Cambodia Industrial Development Policy |
|
Does this Project support to the implementation of the Cambodia Industrial Development Policy?
|
|
11. SECTOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. PROJECT LOCATION: (Describe the location of the project and its components.) |
|
|
| 13. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: (Describe the major purpose of the project.) |
|
-To assess the recruitment status of diversity and quantity of fish larvae injecting to fish stock in the lake;
-To establish baseline data to inform the impacts of development on the lake's tributaries to the Royal Government of Cambodia and other fisheries management and planning in the lake's tributaries.
|
| 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Provide a description of the project and all its components.) |
|
The project will be implemented by Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute (IFReDI). One main tributary which flaw directly to Tonle Sap Lake in each province willlbe selected for fish larvae monitoring from May to September. Fish larvae sample from each tributary will be brought to IFReDI laboratory for species identification and the detail of each fish larvae biology will also be clarified. Tributaries condition such as the aquatic plants, width, water depth, flow, and water quality will also be recorded and analyzed. On the other hands, related secondary data from different sources and line agencies will be reviewed. |
| 15. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: (Give reasons why this particular project is considered worthwhile.) |
|
Main tributaries of Tonle Sap Lake were very important route fishes to migrate up and down for spawning, feeding and growth. By clearly understanding fish larvae species, quantity of fish larvae, habitat situation along the river, water regime, flaw and water quality, it meant that fish stock can be maintained for food, nutrition and income for people livelihoods. Moreover, this research study, can produce reliable baseline data for planning and sustainable conservation. With this regards, if all above main points were not clearly known, establishing fisheries management and planning for sustaining natural fish stock will not be met. On the other hands, natural fish stock will be reduced and further effected on natural productivity and finally effected to the total catches that were that were the daily food and income of the people. |
| 16. BENEFITS (Who will benefit, directly and indirectly, from the project?) |
|
Fishers and their families, local people, fisheries officers and local authorities. |
| 17. FEASIBILITY STUDY |
|
Is a "Feasibility Study " for the Project requied?
|
| 18. SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: (Briefly describe the effects of the project, if any, on the people and the surrounding environment. Will the project assist in alleviating poverty?) |
|
There are no impacts at all on environment and social but contribute to food security, improving living condition of the people, socioeconomic and country development |
| 19. CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
a. Is any activity or output of the project related to Climate Change?
|
|
If Yes, please indicate
|
|
b. How is the project relevant to Climate Change?
|
|
Please select a Climate Change related sector of the project and fill up the contribution of the climate change related expenditure compared to the total project cost.
|
|
Climate Change-Related Sector
|
Percentage
|
Climate Change Relevance
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION |
|
Is any activity or output of the project related to Disaster Risk Reduction?
|
| 21. GENDER ANALYSIS: (How does the project affect the roles of the men and women in the project area? Will women be actively involved in the implementation of the project?) |
|
The project considered gender equity. Women are encouraged to participate based on her competence and experiences. At least 40% women will be promoted to participate. |
| 22. CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT: (Does the Ministry have the skills and experience required to implement the project?) |
|
Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute of Fisheries Administration equipped with qualified staff, appreciated experiences and full capacity to implement this project.
|
| 23. STATUS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: (Provide a brief update on the progress of the project to date. Discuss any major problems causing delays in project implementation.) |
|
So far so good because Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute of fisheries administration equipped with qualified and experiences research staff and without delaying of funding. But risks will occur if staff do not wiling to work no accountability, shortage of collaboration with sub-national or local authorities including there is not enough budget for implementation and funding is on time, etc. |
|
24. PROJECT PRIORITY
:
(Please indicates the priority ranking of the project decided by the ministry/agency.)
|
|
1
|
| 25. DONOR INVOLVEMENT: (Provide any information on current or potential donor involvement in the project.) |
|
Wold Bank, Asian Development bank, EU and USAID |
| 26. REFERENCE: (Please upload the project documents, MOU, or agreements with funding agencies including MEF.) |
|
Part B: Project Costs and Funding Sources
( In US$’000 )
|
|
|