|
PIP No:
990
|
|
1. PROJECT NAME:
Cambodia Nutrition Project
|
|
ឈ្មោះគម្រោងៈ
គម្រោងអាហារូបត្ថម្ភនៅកម្ពុជា
|
| 2. PROJECT DATES: |
|
PROJECT START :
|
|
ESTIMATED COMPLETION :
|
|
|
|
4. RESPONSIBLE MINISTRY:
|
|
RESPONSIBLE UNIT:
|
|
អង្គភាពទទួលខុសត្រូវ:
|
|
5. PROJECT STATUS
|
|
DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION
|
|
|
6. TYPE OF PROJECT:
|
|
7. SOURCE OF PROJECT FUNDING:
|
| 8. THE POLICY AREA OF THE PENTAGON STRATEGY PHASE I THAT THIS PROJECT FALLS UNDER: |
|
|
| 9. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE POLICY: |
|
improving nutrition ,immunization , and neonatal mortality |
| 10. Support to Cambodia Industrial Development Policy |
|
Does this Project support to the implementation of the Cambodia Industrial Development Policy?
|
|
11. SECTOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. PROJECT LOCATION: (Describe the location of the project and its components.) |
|
|
| 13. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: (Describe the major purpose of the project.) |
|
The project development objective is to improve utilization and quality of priority maternal and child health and nutrition services for targeted groups in Cambodia.
|
| 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Provide a description of the project and all its components.) |
|
The Project will finance priority maternal and child health and nutrition services ,a subset of intervention drawn from the MOH investment case for RMNCAH-N in Cambodia(Table1).These priority services are aimed at reducing neonatal mortality ,improving maternal and child nutrition ,and improving routine immunization coverage(referred to herein as priority RMNCAH-N outcome).the priority services were defined in accordance with the expectation of the RGC to coverage on intervention with known effectiveness to increase substanability and efficiency of RMNCAH-N financing . Targeted groups include pregnant and lactating women and children in the first 1000 days of life as well as the targeted areas of Mondulkiri,Ratana kiri,Kratie,StungTreng , Preach Vihear , Kampong Chhnang and KohKong, Banteay Meanchey and Pursat provinces.
|
| 15. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: (Give reasons why this particular project is considered worthwhile.) |
|
The Project is to work together with all relevant partner and the community themselves to enable sustained delivery and use of the most effective prevention and treatment measure. |
| 16. BENEFITS (Who will benefit, directly and indirectly, from the project?) |
|
The project’s primary beneficiaries are women of reproductive age (especially pregnant and lactating women) and children under age two in Cambodia, and health care providers working in the public health sector. Given the geographic focus and the support for HEF promotion, the project will specifically target the poor and underserved. The secondary target beneficiaries are community members interacting with first 1,000 days beneficiaries. |
| 17. FEASIBILITY STUDY |
|
Is a "Feasibility Study " for the Project requied?
|
|
If YES, has it been carried out?
|
| 18. SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: (Briefly describe the effects of the project, if any, on the people and the surrounding environment. Will the project assist in alleviating poverty?) |
|
A social assessment was conducted in three provinces with high concentration of indigenous people, Mondul Kiri, Ratanak Kiri and Kratie and with different ethnic groups that have large populations, namely Phnong, Tumpoun and Stieng in December 2018 during the prepartion of the CNP.
The MOH has prepared an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) as the project environmental safeguards instrument. The EMP, including specific environmental safeguard mitigation measures and a Pest Management Plan, establishes procedures for mitigating any potential adverse environmental impacts, specifies measures for managing and monitoring impacts, and outlines training and capacity building arrangements needed to implement the EMP provisions. The EMP contains Environmental Code of Practices (ECOPs) to address impacts from civil works, a simple Health Care Waste Management Plan (HCWMP), and a Simple Pest Management and Monitoring Plan (PMMP). |
| 19. CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
a. Is any activity or output of the project related to Climate Change?
|
|
If Yes, please indicate
|
|
b. How is the project relevant to Climate Change?
|
|
Please select a Climate Change related sector of the project and fill up the contribution of the climate change related expenditure compared to the total project cost.
|
|
Climate Change-Related Sector
|
Percentage
|
Climate Change Relevance
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION |
|
Is any activity or output of the project related to Disaster Risk Reduction?
|
|
If Yes, please indicate
|
| 21. GENDER ANALYSIS: (How does the project affect the roles of the men and women in the project area? Will women be actively involved in the implementation of the project?) |
|
Project analytical work is underway to identify the most appropriate community-based and facility-based service delivery modalities that can address the needs of working Cambodian women and interventions will be designed accordingly. |
| 22. CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT: (Does the Ministry have the skills and experience required to implement the project?) |
|
Ministry of Health implemented this project with technical and financial support from World Bank and pooling partners.
|
| 23. STATUS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: (Provide a brief update on the progress of the project to date. Discuss any major problems causing delays in project implementation.) |
|
Project progress of component 1:Strengthening the Delivery of Priority Health Services, and
component3:Ensuring an Effective, Sustainable Response |
|
24. PROJECT PRIORITY
:
(Please indicates the priority ranking of the project decided by the ministry/agency.)
|
|
1
|
| 25. DONOR INVOLVEMENT: (Provide any information on current or potential donor involvement in the project.) |
|
The World Bank (WB), Global Financing Facility(GFF), KFW and DEFAT involve in the Implementation Support Mission every 6 months. |
| 26. REFERENCE: (Please upload the project documents, MOU, or agreements with funding agencies including MEF.) |
|
Part B: Project Costs and Funding Sources
( In US$’000 )
|
|
|