|
PIP No:
803
|
|
1. PROJECT NAME:
Public Logistics Service Improvement Project
|
|
ឈ្មោះគម្រោងៈ
គម្រោងធ្វើឱ្យប្រសើឡើងនូវសេវាភស្តុភារកម្មសាធារណៈ
|
| 2. PROJECT DATES: |
|
PROJECT START :
|
|
ESTIMATED COMPLETION :
|
|
|
|
4. RESPONSIBLE MINISTRY:
Ministry of Public Works & Transport
|
|
RESPONSIBLE UNIT:
General Department of Logistic
|
|
អង្គភាពទទួលខុសត្រូវ:
នាយកដ្ឋានសហប្រតិបត្តិការភ័ស្តុភារកម្ម នៃអគ្គនាយកដ្ឋានភស្តុភារកម្ម
|
|
5. PROJECT STATUS
|
|
DETAILED PROJECT INFORMATION
|
|
|
6. TYPE OF PROJECT:
|
|
7. SOURCE OF PROJECT FUNDING:
|
| 8. THE POLICY AREA OF THE PENTAGON STRATEGY PHASE I THAT THIS PROJECT FALLS UNDER: |
|
|
| 9. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PROJECT TO ACHIEVE THE ABOVE POLICY: |
|
- Component 1: Improving functions of the logistics market with sound regulation and competition
- Component 2: Introduction of the private sector in areas where public monopolies currently dominate the market to enhance competition. |
| 10. Support to Cambodia Industrial Development Policy |
|
Does this Project support to the implementation of the Cambodia Industrial Development Policy?
|
|
11. SECTOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. PROJECT LOCATION: (Describe the location of the project and its components.) |
|
|
| 13. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: (Describe the major purpose of the project.) |
|
- To enhance competition within each of the logistics sub-sector
- To improve efficiency and levels of services in the logistics industry.
|
| 14. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (Provide a description of the project and all its components.) |
|
The transport modes such as port, railway, and airport do not provide service providers options to choose, so the logistics market improvement project should be proposed. |
| 15. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: (Give reasons why this particular project is considered worthwhile.) |
|
- The cost of the transport modes is high compared with shared border countries
- The participation of private sector and competition is limited. |
| 16. BENEFITS (Who will benefit, directly and indirectly, from the project?) |
|
- Quality of operations /services is expected to be improved.
- Transport costs will be reduced positively
- Monopoly scenario will be decreased.
|
| 17. FEASIBILITY STUDY |
|
Is a "Feasibility Study " for the Project requied?
|
|
If YES, has it been carried out?
|
| 18. SOCIAL & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: (Briefly describe the effects of the project, if any, on the people and the surrounding environment. Will the project assist in alleviating poverty?) |
|
No Environment and Social Impact |
| 19. CLIMATE CHANGE |
|
a. Is any activity or output of the project related to Climate Change?
|
|
b. How is the project relevant to Climate Change?
|
|
Please select a Climate Change related sector of the project and fill up the contribution of the climate change related expenditure compared to the total project cost.
|
|
Climate Change-Related Sector
|
Percentage
|
Climate Change Relevance
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. DISASTER RISK REDUCTION |
|
Is any activity or output of the project related to Disaster Risk Reduction?
|
| 21. GENDER ANALYSIS: (How does the project affect the roles of the men and women in the project area? Will women be actively involved in the implementation of the project?) |
|
This project does not affect the role of men and women, but the project will benefit young people |
| 22. CAPACITY TO IMPLEMENT: (Does the Ministry have the skills and experience required to implement the project?) |
|
N/A
|
| 23. STATUS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION: (Provide a brief update on the progress of the project to date. Discuss any major problems causing delays in project implementation.) |
|
N/A |
|
24. PROJECT PRIORITY
:
(Please indicates the priority ranking of the project decided by the ministry/agency.)
|
|
6
|
| 25. DONOR INVOLVEMENT: (Provide any information on current or potential donor involvement in the project.) |
|
- JICA
- World Bank |
| 26. REFERENCE: (Please upload the project documents, MOU, or agreements with funding agencies including MEF.) |
|
Part B: Project Costs and Funding Sources
( In US$’000 )
|
|
|